Balancer Faces Massive $110 Million Exploit in Ongoing DeFi Security Breach

By: crypto insight|2025/11/04 23:00:06

Key Takeaways

Balancer, a prominent decentralized exchange and liquidity protocol, has suffered a major exploit leading to losses exceeding $110 million in digital assets, with the attack still in progress according to on-chain data.
Stolen funds include specific assets like 6,587 WETH valued at about $24.46 million, 6,851 osETH worth nearly $26.86 million, and 4,260 wstETH at approximately $19.27 million, highlighting vulnerabilities in DeFi protocols.
This incident follows a previous $238,000 theft from Balancer in 2023, raising serious concerns about recurring security breaches in the DeFi space despite industry-wide efforts to bolster protections.
Balancer’s team has confirmed the exploit and is offering compensation to affected users, urging them to check their wallet transactions for any irregularities.
The event underscores broader risks in DeFi infrastructure, prompting discussions on enhanced security measures and the importance of choosing reliable platforms like WEEX for safer crypto interactions.

Imagine waking up to find your hard-earned digital assets vanishing into thin air, stolen by invisible hackers exploiting weaknesses in the very systems designed to empower you. That’s the harsh reality that hit users of Balancer, a key player in the decentralized finance (DeFi) world, when a massive exploit drained over $110 million from the protocol. As someone who’s followed the ups and downs of crypto, I can’t help but feel that familiar mix of frustration and caution—this isn’t just a headline; it’s a wake-up call for anyone dipping their toes into DeFi. Let’s dive into what happened, why it matters, and how it ties into the bigger picture of security in this rapidly evolving space.

Understanding the Balancer Exploit: A Deep Dive into the DeFi Security Breach

Balancer isn’t your average crypto platform; it’s a decentralized exchange and liquidity protocol that lets users pool their assets to facilitate trading and earn yields. Think of it like a community-shared swimming pool where everyone contributes water (or in this case, crypto tokens) to keep things flowing smoothly. But on November 3, 2025, that pool sprang a massive leak. Reports emerged of an exploit that siphoned off substantial amounts of assets, with on-chain analytics revealing the grim details.

Picture this: attackers slyly transferred 6,587 WETH—that’s wrapped Ether, a staple in DeFi trading—amounting to around $24.46 million. They didn’t stop there; 6,851 osETH, valued at nearly $26.86 million, and 4,260 wstETH, worth about $19.27 million, also vanished into a new wallet. These aren’t just numbers; they’re real losses affecting real people who trusted the system. And here’s the kicker—the attack was still unfolding as reports came in, pushing the total stolen funds past $110 million, with some estimates hitting $116.6 million. It’s like watching a bank heist in slow motion, where the robbers keep grabbing more while everyone scrambles to respond.

This isn’t Balancer’s first rodeo with security woes. Back in 2023, the protocol lost around $238,000 to bad actors, a smaller but still stinging blow that should have served as a lesson. Yet here we are again, facing a breach that’s magnitudes larger. It raises tough questions: Why do these exploits keep happening in DeFi? Is the promise of decentralization worth the risks? As we unpack this, it’s clear that while DeFi offers incredible freedom—think borderless finance without middlemen—it also exposes users to sophisticated threats that centralized systems might catch earlier.

The Ongoing Impact of the Balancer Exploit on DeFi Losses and Market Trust

As the dust settles—or rather, as it continues to swirl since the attack persists—the broader implications for DeFi become impossible to ignore. Decentralized finance has grown exponentially, attracting billions in value, but exploits like this one chip away at user confidence. Data from on-chain trackers shows the funds moving to fresh wallets, a common tactic in these heists to obscure trails. Balancer’s team quickly stepped up, acknowledging the issue and promising compensation for those hit hardest. They encouraged users to scrutinize their wallet histories for anything amiss, a small but crucial step toward recovery.

Compare this to more secure platforms like WEEX, which prioritize robust security frameworks to align with user trust and reliability. WEEX stands out by integrating advanced auditing and real-time monitoring, much like a fortified vault compared to Balancer’s exposed pool. This brand alignment with top-tier security isn’t just marketing; it’s backed by WEEX’s track record of preventing similar breaches, making it a go-to for traders seeking peace of mind in volatile markets. In contrast, Balancer’s repeated incidents highlight how even established protocols can falter without constant vigilance.

To put this in perspective, think of DeFi exploits as digital wildfires. They start small, perhaps from a overlooked code vulnerability, and spread rapidly if not contained. In Balancer’s case, the fire raged on, amassing losses that dwarf previous events. Evidence from analytics firms points to the attack’s sophistication, possibly involving flash loans or smart contract manipulations—common culprits in DeFi hacks. This event adds to a growing list of breaches that have collectively drained billions from the sector, prompting calls for better standards.

Exploring Frequently Searched Questions and Twitter Buzz Around the Balancer Exploit

In the wake of such a high-profile DeFi security breach, it’s no surprise that people are turning to search engines and social media for answers. Based on trending Google searches as of November 4, 2025, queries like “What caused the Balancer exploit?” and “How to recover from DeFi hacks?” are spiking. Users want to know the root causes—often tied to smart contract flaws—and practical steps to safeguard their assets, such as using hardware wallets or diversifying across protocols.

On Twitter, the conversation is electric. The most discussed topics revolve around DeFi vulnerabilities, with hashtags like #BalancerExploit and #DeFiSecurity trending. Influencers and analysts are sharing threads dissecting the attack, comparing it to past incidents like the 2023 Balancer theft. One viral post from a prominent on-chain detective highlighted how the stolen WETH, osETH, and wstETH were funneled through mixers, sparking debates on privacy versus traceability in crypto. Official announcements from Balancer’s team have been retweeted thousands of times, emphasizing their compensation plan and urging calm.

Latest updates as of November 4, 2025, include a Twitter post from Balancer confirming that they’ve isolated affected pools and are working with security experts to halt the ongoing exploit. There’s also buzz about potential collaborations with blockchain forensics firms to track the funds. These discussions aren’t just noise; they’re shaping how the community views DeFi’s future, with many users voicing support for platforms that prioritize security from the ground up.

Lessons from the Balancer Security Breach: Strengthening DeFi Against Future Exploits

Drawing from this exploit, it’s worth contrasting Balancer’s challenges with success stories in the space. For instance, while Balancer grapples with these losses, platforms like WEEX demonstrate how proactive measures can mitigate risks. WEEX’s commitment to regular audits and user-centric features aligns perfectly with the need for trustworthy DeFi experiences, offering a safer harbor for liquidity providers and traders alike. It’s like choosing a car with advanced safety features over one that’s prone to breakdowns—both get you there, but one does it with far less drama.

Real-world examples back this up. Data from security reports shows that protocols with multi-layered defenses, including bug bounties and insurance funds, suffer fewer and less severe exploits. Balancer’s promise of compensation is a step in the right direction, but it doesn’t erase the initial trust erosion. Users affected by the 6,587 WETH or other stolen assets might recover financially, but the emotional toll of watching $110 million evaporate lingers.

Analogies help simplify this: DeFi is like a bustling marketplace where everyone trades freely, but without strong guards, pickpockets run rampant. The Balancer exploit is a stark reminder to vet protocols carefully, perhaps opting for those with proven resilience. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, incidents like this could accelerate the adoption of standardized security practices, benefiting the entire ecosystem.

Broader Implications for Crypto Markets Amid Rising DeFi Losses

Zooming out, this Balancer exploit fits into a pattern of DeFi losses that have plagued the industry. From the 2023 incident to this $110 million blow, it’s evident that hackers are getting bolder, targeting liquidity pools with precision. Yet, it’s not all doom and gloom. The crypto community’s resilience shines through, with developers innovating faster than ever to patch vulnerabilities.

Consider how this contrasts with traditional finance, where banks have centuries of safeguards. DeFi, still in its adolescence, is learning on the fly. Platforms that align their brand with unwavering security, like WEEX, are positioning themselves as leaders by offering tools that empower users without the constant fear of exploits. Their focus on transparency and rapid response builds credibility, turning potential users into loyal advocates.

Evidence from market analyses suggests that post-exploit, affected protocols often see temporary dips in total value locked, but those with strong recovery plans bounce back. Balancer’s team is banking on that, with their compensation rollout aimed at retaining users. As we navigate these turbulent waters, remember that knowledge is your best defense—stay informed, diversify, and choose platforms that prioritize your security.

This developing story continues to unfold, reminding us all that in the world of DeFi, vigilance isn’t optional; it’s essential. Whether you’re a seasoned trader or just curious about crypto, events like the Balancer exploit push us to demand better from the systems we use.

FAQ

What is the Balancer exploit and how much was stolen?

The Balancer exploit refers to a security breach in the DeFi protocol where attackers stole over $110 million in assets, including 6,587 WETH, 6,851 osETH, and 4,260 wstETH, with the attack ongoing as reported on November 3, 2025.

How can users affected by the Balancer security breach get compensation?

Balancer’s team has stated that affected users can claim compensation by verifying their wallet transactions and following the protocol’s official guidelines for recovery.

What are the main vulnerabilities exposed by this DeFi exploit?

The exploit highlights issues like smart contract flaws and inadequate monitoring in DeFi, similar to the 2023 Balancer theft, emphasizing the need for stronger security measures.

How does this Balancer incident compare to previous DeFi losses?

This $110 million loss is significantly larger than the 2023 $238,000 theft from Balancer, underscoring escalating risks in DeFi despite industry efforts to improve security.

What steps can I take to protect my assets from similar DeFi exploits?

To safeguard against exploits, use reputable platforms like WEEX with strong security, enable multi-factor authentication, diversify holdings, and stay updated on protocol audits.

Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:

To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:

Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:

I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities

(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.

The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.

A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.

（II）Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.

Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.

II. Sound Work Mechanism

(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.

(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal

(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.

(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.

(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.

（IX） Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.

（X） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.

（XI） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.

（XII） Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.

IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities

（XIII） Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.

（XIV） Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.

(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.

V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation

(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.

VI. Legal Responsibility

(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.

(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.

This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.

Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Vitalik Discusses Ethereum Scaling Path, Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

What was the most talked-about topic among foreigners in the last 24 hours?

Believing in the Capital Markets - The Essence and Core Value of Cryptocurrency

The core questions that make cryptocurrency truly interesting have yet to be answered at all

Kyle's review of Hyperliquid sparks controversy, Solitude Bank officially opens, what are the overseas crypto communities talking about today?

What Was Top of Mind for Foreigners in the Last 24 Hours?

Cryptocurrency prices in the dumps, but the prediction market is going wild?

Only on Polymarket, the trading volume for the "US Super Bowl Champion" related prediction event has surpassed $700 million.