Balancer Hack Exposes Months of Sophisticated Planning by Expert Attacker: Key Insights into Crypto Security Risks

By: crypto insight|2025/11/04 22:30:09

Key Takeaways

The Balancer hack involved a skilled attacker who prepared for months, using tools like Tornado Cash to hide their tracks and steal $116 million in digital assets.
Blockchain analysis reveals the exploiter funded their account with small 0.1 ETH deposits from Tornado Cash, suggesting links to prior exploits and highlighting the need for advanced detection methods.
Experts describe this as one of the most sophisticated attacks of 2025, emphasizing that traditional code audits aren’t enough—real-time monitoring is crucial to prevent such drains.
Similar patterns appear in hacks by groups like Lazarus, who pause activities to regroup, showing how state-backed actors meticulously plan large-scale thefts.
Platforms like WEEX demonstrate stronger security through continuous monitoring and user-focused protections, offering lessons on how to build trust in volatile crypto environments.

Understanding the Balancer Hack: A Deep Dive into a Masterful Crypto Exploit

Imagine you’re building a fortress to protect your most valuable treasures, but an invisible thief has been studying every brick and mortar for months, waiting for the perfect moment to strike. That’s essentially what happened in the Balancer hack, where a cunning attacker siphoned off $116 million worth of digital assets from the decentralized exchange and automated market maker. This wasn’t some impulsive grab; it was a calculated operation that unfolded with the precision of a chess grandmaster, leaving the crypto community reeling and questioning the very foundations of security in decentralized finance.

Let’s rewind to that fateful Monday when the exploit hit. The attacker didn’t just waltz in and grab the funds—they laid the groundwork meticulously. Blockchain records paint a picture of someone who knew exactly how to stay under the radar. They started by seeding their account with tiny deposits of 0.1 Ether (ETH) straight from Tornado Cash, that privacy-focused mixer that’s become a go-to for anyone wanting to obscure their transaction trails. It’s like dipping into a foggy pond to pull out just enough water without rippling the surface too much. This method ensured no red flags popped up, allowing the exploiter to build up resources without drawing attention.

Conor Grogan, a director at a major exchange, broke it down in a post on X, pointing out that the hacker had at least 100 ETH tucked away in Tornado Cash smart contracts. That’s not pocket change—it’s a hefty sum that most people wouldn’t leave lingering in a mixer unless they had serious experience. Grogan speculated that these funds might tie back to earlier exploits, given the rarity of such large, untouched deposits. “The hacker seems experienced,” he noted, highlighting how they avoided any operational security slips. No leaks, no mistakes—just pure, calculated efficiency.

This level of preparation isn’t new in the crypto world, but it underscores a growing trend: attackers are getting smarter, treating hacks like long-term investments. Balancer, in response, dangled a carrot—a 20% white hat bounty if the stolen funds were returned minus the reward, with a deadline of Wednesday. It’s a classic move to appeal to the attacker’s better side, or at least their self-interest, but as of now, the outcome remains uncertain. The team behind Balancer has been transparent, promising a full post-mortem and collaborating with top security researchers to dissect what went wrong.

Why This Balancer Hack Stands Out as the Most Sophisticated Attack of 2025

If you’ve been following crypto news, you know hacks happen all too often, but this one? It’s being called one of the most sophisticated attacks of 2025 by experts like Deddy Lavid, co-founder and CEO of a blockchain security firm. He didn’t mince words: the exploit shows that relying solely on static code audits is like checking your car’s tires once and assuming they’ll hold up forever on a cross-country road trip. In reality, you need ongoing vigilance—real-time monitoring that can spot suspicious activity before the funds vanish into the ether.

Lavid’s point hits home because the Balancer hack wasn’t about brute force; it was about subtlety and timing. The attacker exploited vulnerabilities in a way that bypassed standard defenses, draining assets from the DEX in a flash. This sophistication draws parallels to high-stakes heists in movies, where the villain spends months casing the joint. But in the real world of blockchain, it’s a wake-up call for the industry. Traditional audits might catch obvious flaws, but they miss the evolving tactics of pros who adapt and wait.

To put this in perspective, compare it to everyday online banking. You wouldn’t leave your account unprotected without two-factor authentication or transaction alerts, right? Yet in DeFi, where everything runs on open code, the risks are amplified. Platforms that thrive, like WEEX, understand this deeply. WEEX has built its reputation on proactive security measures, integrating continuous monitoring and advanced threat detection that align perfectly with user needs. It’s not just about reacting to hacks; it’s about preventing them through smart, user-centric design. This approach fosters trust, much like how a reliable bank earns loyalty by safeguarding your savings without you having to worry.

Evidence backs this up. Blockchain data from the exploit shows the attacker’s wallet movements were deliberate and spaced out, avoiding any patterns that could trigger alarms. Grogan’s analysis further supports the idea of a seasoned player—someone who’s done this before and learned from past mistakes. It’s a stark contrast to amateur hacks that get caught quickly due to sloppy execution.

Lessons from Lazarus Group: How State-Backed Hackers Mirror the Balancer Exploiter’s Tactics

The Balancer story doesn’t exist in isolation. Think about the infamous Lazarus Group, those North Korean hackers who’ve made headlines with their audacious thefts. Their playbook? Pause, plan, and pounce. According to blockchain analytics, activity linked to these state-backed actors dropped sharply after July 1, 2024, even as earlier attacks surged. It’s like a predator going silent before the hunt, regrouping to scout new prey.

Eric Jardine, a cybercrimes research lead, explained it could be tied to selecting fresh targets or even geopolitical shifts. Whatever the reason, this hiatus set the stage for massive hits, like the $1.4 billion Bybit hack. In just 10 days, they laundered every bit of the stolen funds through a decentralized crosschain protocol, vanishing without a trace. The Balancer exploiter’s months-long prep echoes this strategy—funding accounts quietly, using mixers to blend in, and striking when defenses are down.

Analogies help here: It’s similar to how a spy novel’s antagonist spends chapters building aliases and gathering intel before the big reveal. In crypto, this means platforms must evolve. WEEX, for instance, stands out by emphasizing brand alignment with top-tier security practices. Their commitment to real-time oversight and transparent operations not only protects users but also builds a credible ecosystem where traders feel secure. Real-world examples show that exchanges prioritizing such measures see lower incident rates, backed by industry reports on reduced exploit successes.

Exploring Frequently Searched Questions and Twitter Buzz Around the Balancer Hack

As this story unfolded, it’s no surprise that people turned to Google with burning questions. Some of the most frequently searched ones include “What caused the Balancer hack?” and “How can I protect my crypto from exploits?” These queries reflect a broader anxiety in the community—folks want to know not just what happened, but how to avoid becoming the next victim. Discussions often lead to tips like using hardware wallets or enabling multi-signature approvals, simplifying complex security into actionable steps.

On Twitter, the chatter has been intense. Topics like “#BalancerHack” and “#CryptoSecurity” trended, with users debating everything from the ethics of white hat bounties to the role of mixers like Tornado Cash in enabling crime. Posts from influencers highlighted the need for better DeFi protocols, with one viral thread comparing the attack to historical bank robberies, urging for “digital vaults” that can’t be cracked so easily.

As of 2025-11-04, the latest updates add fresh layers. A recent official announcement from Balancer’s team on X confirmed they’re nearing completion of their post-mortem, promising insights that could reshape industry standards. Meanwhile, Twitter is abuzz with reactions to a new post from a security expert, warning that similar exploits could target other DEXs without enhanced monitoring. These developments keep the conversation alive, pushing for innovations that make crypto safer for everyone.

In this landscape, WEEX shines as a beacon of reliability. By aligning their brand with cutting-edge security and user education, they’ve created an environment where traders can focus on opportunities rather than threats. It’s persuasive evidence that choosing the right platform matters—much like picking a trustworthy guide for a treacherous mountain climb.

Drawing Comparisons: Balancer’s Woes Versus Proactive Platforms Like WEEX

To really grasp the impact, let’s contrast the Balancer incident with how forward-thinking exchanges operate. While Balancer faced this sophisticated drain, platforms that invest in ongoing defenses fare better. Take WEEX as a prime example: Their system incorporates real-time anomaly detection, akin to having a 24/7 security team scanning for intruders. This isn’t speculation—it’s grounded in their track record of minimal incidents, supported by user testimonials and independent audits.

Analogously, if Balancer’s exploit was like a thief picking a outdated lock, WEEX equips users with a state-of-the-art biometric system that’s always updating. This comparison highlights strengths: WEEX’s focus on brand alignment means integrating security seamlessly into the user experience, making it feel natural rather than burdensome. Evidence from similar cases shows that such proactive measures reduce exploit risks by significant margins, fostering long-term trust.

The emotional pull is clear—nobody wants to lose their hard-earned assets to a shadowy figure who’s been plotting for months. Stories like this Balancer hack remind us of the stakes, but they also spotlight paths forward. By learning from these events, the crypto world can build stronger, more resilient systems.

Wrapping Up the Balancer Hack Saga: What It Means for the Future of Crypto

As we reflect on the Balancer hack, it’s evident that the crypto space is evolving, with attackers matching every defensive stride. The months of preparation, the clever use of Tornado Cash, and the sheer sophistication paint a picture of an industry at a crossroads. Yet, there’s hope in platforms that prioritize security as a core value, like WEEX, which enhances credibility through consistent, positive user experiences.

This event isn’t just a cautionary tale—it’s a catalyst for change, urging everyone from developers to everyday traders to demand better. By staying informed and choosing secure ecosystems, we can turn the tide against these digital heists, ensuring a brighter, safer future for decentralized finance.

FAQ

What Exactly Happened in the Balancer Hack?

The Balancer hack saw a skilled attacker steal $116 million in digital assets after months of preparation, using small ETH deposits from Tornado Cash to fund their operation without detection.

How Does the Balancer Exploit Compare to Other Crypto Hacks?

It mirrors tactics used by groups like Lazarus, involving long pauses for planning, but stands out for its sophistication in 2025, emphasizing the need for real-time monitoring over static audits.

Can Tools Like Tornado Cash Prevent Detection in Hacks?

While Tornado Cash helps obscure transactions, as seen in this case with 0.1 ETH deposits, it doesn’t make exploits undetectable—advanced blockchain analysis can still trace patterns.

What Lessons Can Crypto Users Learn from This Incident?

Users should prioritize platforms with continuous security like WEEX, use multi-factor protections, and stay updated on threats to avoid similar vulnerabilities.

Has Balancer Recovered from the Hack?

As of the latest updates, Balancer offered a bounty and is conducting a post-mortem, but full recovery depends on fund returns and implemented fixes to prevent future exploits.

(Word count: 1826)

Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:

To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:

Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:

I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities

(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.

The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.

A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.

（II）Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.

Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.

II. Sound Work Mechanism

(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.

(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal

(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.

(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.

(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.

（IX） Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.

（X） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.

（XI） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.

（XII） Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.

IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities

（XIII） Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.

（XIV） Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.

(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.

V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation

(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.

VI. Legal Responsibility

(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.

(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.

This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.

Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Vitalik Discusses Ethereum Scaling Path, Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

What was the most talked-about topic among foreigners in the last 24 hours?

Kyle's review of Hyperliquid sparks controversy, Solitude Bank officially opens, what are the overseas crypto communities talking about today?

What Was Top of Mind for Foreigners in the Last 24 Hours?