Glassnode: BTC Dips to $89K, Options Market Shows Continued Hedging Sentiment

By: blockbeats|2025/11/20 15:00:03
0
Share
copy

Original Title: Below the Band
Original Authors: Chris Beamish, CryptoVizArt, Antoine Colpaert, Glassnode

Original Translation: Golden Finance

Key Points of the Article:

• Bitcoin has dropped below the STH (Short-Term Holder) cost basis and the -1 STD (Standard Deviation) range, putting pressure on recent buyers; the $95,000 to $97,000 range has now become a key resistance level, and reclaiming this area would signify an early step in market structure recovery.

• Spot demand remains weak, with significant negative fund flows in the US spot ETF, and TradFi asset allocators have not added any buy-side pressure.
• Speculative leverage continues to decline, reflected in decreasing open interest in futures contracts for the top 500 assets and funding rates dropping to cycle lows.

• The options market has significantly repriced risk, with implied volatility rising across all tenors, skew remaining low as traders pay a premium for downside risk protection.
• Downside put option-dominated flows and demand around key strike prices (e.g., 90K) have reinforced defensive positioning strategies, with traders actively hedging more than adding to upside risk exposure.

• DVOL has recovered to monthly highs, linking volatility, skew, and flow metrics for a broad repricing of risk and signaling the expectation of near-term volatility increase.

Bitcoin has broken below its previous consolidation range, dropping below $97,000 to briefly touch $89,000, establishing a new local low and flipping its year-to-date gains negative. This deeper decline extends the mild bear trend we highlighted last week, prompting questions about the potential reemergence of structural support. In this issue, we will use on-chain pricing models and short-term holder loss realization to assess the market's response to this decline. Following that, we will analyze options, ETF fund flows, and futures positions to evaluate how speculators are adjusting their sentiment in this new round of soft market conditions.

On-Chain Insights

Breaking Below the Lower Band

Breaking below $97,000, the lower bound of last week's "range-bound area," signaled the risk of a deeper pullback. Subsequently, the price plummeted to $89,000, forming a new local low, below the -1 standard deviation level relative to the short-term holder cost basis (currently near $109,500).

This decline confirms that nearly all investor groups have experienced losses recently, a structure that historically triggers panic selling and weakens market momentum, requiring time to recover. In the short term, the $95,000 to $97,000 range may pose local resistance, and regaining this range would indicate a gradual market balance restoration.

Glassnode: BTC Dips to $89K, Options Market Shows Continued Hedging Sentiment

Panic Selling Peaks

From an investor behavior standpoint, this recent crash marks the third time since early 2024 that the price has dropped below the short-term holder cost basis model. However, the panic level of top buyers this time is significantly higher. The 7-day moving average of Short-Term Holder (STH) realized losses has surged to a daily $5.23 billion, reaching the highest level since the FTX flash crash.

Such a high realized loss highlights a heavier top structure formed between $106,000 and $118,000, with a density far exceeding previous cycle peaks. This indicates that either stronger demand is needed to absorb BTC sell-offs, or the market needs to go through a longer, deeper accumulation phase to restore balance.

Testing Active Demand

Reexamining the valuation model, the market has now entered uncharted territory, with speculative interest significantly increasing in this mild bear market phase. The first major defense area is the Active Investors' Realized Price, currently around $88,600. The trading price of Bitcoin near this level is equivalent to the cost basis of non-dormant holders who have actively traded in recent months, making it a potential mid-term trading range.

However, if the price decisively breaks below this model, it signifies the first time in this cycle that the price has dropped below active investors' cost basis, clearly indicating a bearish trend dominating the market.

Another Form of Retreat

While the Bitcoin price has fallen below the key lower limit of the short-term holder cost basis model, the scale and extent of losses suffered by investors are far less severe than during the extreme conditions of the 2022-2023 bear market. The chart below tracks all currently underwater cryptocurrencies and groups them by the depth of their unrealized drawdown. Currently, about 6.3 million Bitcoins are in a losing position, with most of the losses ranging from -10% to -23.6%.

This distribution more closely resembles the brief range-bound market of the first quarter of 2022 rather than a stage of deep capitulation.

Hence, the price range between the Active Investors' Realized Price ($88,600) and the true market mean ($82,000) may serve as a delineation between a mild bear market phase and a structure resembling the full-fledged bear market of 2022-2023.

Off-chain Insight

Insufficient ETF Demand

The continuous outflow of funds from U.S. spot ETFs has consistently reflected a significant lack of demand, with the 7-day moving average remaining negative in recent weeks. The persistent outflow indicates that traditional financial asset allocators are unwilling to increase their holdings in the current bearish market, in stark contrast to the strong inflow pattern that supported the previous market rally. The sustained weakness suggests that non-discretionary investment demand has cooled significantly, highlighting the absence of incremental buyers, one of the market's largest marginal buyer groups, further reinforcing the overall constrained demand situation. The lack of continuous inflow into ETFs indicates that a key pillar of demand has yet to recover, leading to a critical demand source missing from this cycle's market.

No Risk Sign

This week, the open interest of futures contracts continued to decline in sync with prices, indicating a sustained reduction in speculative activity. Traders have not taken advantage of the dip to buy but have systematically closed positions, leading to a significantly lower derivatives market position than the previous decline level. The absence of leverage expansion highlights market participants' cautious attitude, aligning with the broader trend of reduced demand from risk-seeking groups.

The ongoing contraction of futures positions highlights that the market remains unwilling to deploy funds, further exacerbating the lack of confidence behind the current price trend.

Financing Rate at a Cyclical Low

As the open interest of futures contracts continues to decrease, the derivatives market is signaling a clear reduction in speculative positions. Traders are closing positions rather than buying the dip, leading to a leverage ratio in open interest significantly lower than the previous decline level.

This dynamic is also reflected in the financing market, where the top 500 asset rates have notably turned towards neutral or negative territory. The previously observed premium rally has now turned negative, highlighting a widespread cooling of leveraged long demand and a market shift towards more defensive strategies.

The decrease in open interest and negative financing collectively confirm that speculative leverage is systematically being withdrawn from the market, thereby strengthening risk-off sentiment.

Sharp Rise in Implied Volatility

The options market is typically the first market to reprice risk, and after a brief dip in the Bitcoin price below $90,000, the options market promptly completed a risk reassessment. Implied volatility across all maturities has sharply risen, with the near-term options showing the most intense reaction. The chart shows a significant increase in short-term options volatility, with the entire options curve undergoing extensive repricing.

This growth reflects two driving factors. First, the demand for downside protection has increased as traders prepare for a potential larger pullback. Second, the response from the short-gamma trading desks. Many traders have had to buy back short options and roll positions up, mechanically driving up the near-term implied volatility.

The implied volatility is currently close to the levels seen during the October 11 liquidation event, indicating that traders have rapidly reassessed recent risks.

This Dislocation Confirms Concerns

From implied volatility to skew, the options market is conveying the same message. The 25delta skew remains negative across all tenors, with the skew for a one-week tenor nearing extreme bearish levels. The premium for one-week puts is around 14%, indicating that traders are willing to pay a higher price for downside protection regardless of the spot price.

This behavior can create a self-fulfilling prophecy. When traders buy these put options, dealers often end up holding short positions. To hedge this risk, they sell futures or perpetual contracts. This selling pressure can further exacerbate market stress and potentially amplify the softening trend traders are trying to hedge against.

The yield curve for long-term bonds also tilts bearishly, but to a lesser extent. The yield curve for a six-month tenor is slightly below 5%, indicating that market concerns are primarily focused on short-term bonds rather than the entire tenor range.

Demand for Downside Protection

From market dislocation to actual trading activity, the trading volume over the past seven days has also confirmed a similar pattern. Traders have bought a significant amount of put option premium, far exceeding the demand for call options. This aligns with hedging behavior, reflecting that traders are more inclined to hedge against further market declines rather than bet on an increase.

The lackluster trading activity in call options further confirms that traders have not significantly increased risk exposure before the year-end. Compared to the flow in put options, the buying and selling volumes of call options have remained at lower levels, supporting the view that caution rather than speculation is driving position changes.

Overall, this combination suggests that the market is preparing for volatility and is more inclined towards protection rather than risk-taking.

90K Strike Option Premium

Building on overall fund flow data, the put option premium for the 90K strike shows that as prices weaken, protective demand accelerates. Over the past two weeks, the net put option premium for this strike has remained relatively balanced until Bitcoin broke below the $93,000 level. Once below this level, traders increased selling pressure on these put options, leading to a significant rise in the option premium for the 90K strike.

This behavior indicates that as spot pressure intensifies, traders are willing to pay an increasingly higher price to obtain downside protection. This move also aligns with the earlier rise in short-term implied volatility, as the concentrated demand at key strike prices often drives up the price of near-term contracts.

The sharp repricing of the 90K put option underscores how quickly downside hedging activity accelerates when key price levels are breached.

Pricing Market Fragility

The DVOL index has shifted from individual option prices to a broader volatility gauge, reflecting the extent to which the market is repricing risk. The DVOL index, which approached 40 three weeks ago, has since rebounded to near its monthly high around 50. DVOL reflects the implied volatility of a basket of fixed-term options, so when the DVOL index rises, it indicates traders expect larger future price swings.

This uptick ties the overall trend in the options market together. Implied volatility across maturities is on the rise, skew remains negative, recent fund flows' delta is negative, and traders seem reluctant to increase risk heading into year-end. These factors collectively suggest the market is gearing up for significant price volatility. Key drivers include perpetual contract liquidation risk, macroeconomic uncertainty, and ETF inflows leading to weak spot demand.

The next event that could alter this volatility landscape is the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting three weeks from now. Until then, the options market will continue to signal caution and clearly indicate a preference for hedging.

The rise in DVOL further confirms that the market is digesting expectations of greater future volatility, with traders preparing for market swings.

Conclusion

Bitcoin continues to navigate a challenging market phase characterized by a weak market structure, shrinking speculative demand, and a significant surge in derivatives market hedging sentiment.

Spot demand remains subdued, ETF inflows are negative, and the futures market shows no intention to leverage up in a weakened state.

Meanwhile, implied volatility, skew, and hedge fund flows all indicate heightened investor concerns over recent downside risks, with a willingness to pay an increasing premium for protection.

All these factors together form a market seeking stability, with its future direction hinging on whether demand can reemerge near key price levels or if the current fragility will evolve into a deeper retracement or bear market.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more