Unraveling the $284 Million DeFi Puzzle: How Stream Finance’s Collapse Exposed Hidden Stablecoin Risks

By: crypto insight|2025/11/04 22:30:09

Key Takeaways

DeFi researchers from Yields and More uncovered over $284 million in loans and stablecoin exposures tied to Stream Finance’s downfall, highlighting vulnerabilities in interconnected lending markets.
Major platforms like Euler, Silo, Morpho, and Gearbox were linked to Stream’s synthetic assets, with complex loops involving stablecoins such as deUSD and scUSD amplifying the risks.
Elixir, one of the key players, reported $68 million lent to Stream, representing about 65% of its stablecoin backing, while TelosC faced around $123 million in exposure.
The incident stemmed from a $93 million loss due to an external fund manager, leading to depegging of assets like xUSD and raising broader concerns about DeFi transparency.
As of 2025, ongoing discussions on Twitter and Google searches emphasize the need for stronger risk management in DeFi, with platforms like WEEX emerging as models for secure, transparent trading.

Imagine stepping into a vast, interconnected web where every thread represents a financial promise—loans, stablecoins, and yields that seem too good to be true. Now picture one key thread snapping, sending ripples that could tangle millions in debt. That’s the stark reality DeFi enthusiasts faced when Stream Finance unraveled, exposing a staggering $284 million in loans and stablecoin risks. It’s a tale that reminds us how thrilling yet precarious the world of decentralized finance can be, much like navigating a high-stakes game of Jenga where one wrong move topples the tower. In this deep dive, we’ll unpack what happened, why it matters, and how it shapes the future of DeFi—while spotlighting reliable players like WEEX that prioritize transparency and security to keep your investments steady.

The DeFi Sleuths Who Mapped the Mess: Yields and More Steps In

It all started with a group of sharp-eyed DeFi researchers from Yields and More, or YAM as they’re often called. These folks aren’t your average armchair analysts; they’re like digital detectives, piecing together clues from blockchain data to reveal hidden truths. On a Tuesday that shook the DeFi community, they dropped a bombshell post outlining more than $284 million in stablecoin exposure and outstanding loans directly linked to Stream Finance. This wasn’t just a random number—it was a meticulously mapped network of debts spanning various lending markets and vaults.

Think of it like tracing a family tree, but instead of ancestors, you’re following money trails through protocols like Euler, Silo, Morpho, and Gearbox. These platforms held positions tied to Stream’s synthetic assets, including xUSD, xBTC, and xETH. The researchers highlighted intricate exposure loops involving other assets, such as Elixir’s deUSD and Treeve’s scUSD, suggesting that at least $284.9 million in debt is still owed across these markets. And that’s not even counting indirect hits through secondary vaults or clever lending strategies. It’s a reminder that in DeFi, what looks like isolated plays can quickly become a domino effect, much like how a single leaky pipe can flood an entire building if left unchecked.

The post didn’t stop at numbers; it named names. DeFi funds and curators like TelosC, Elixir, MEV Capital, Varlamore, and Re7 Labs were called out for their involvement. TelosC, for instance, carried about $123 million in material exposure—a hefty sum that could make any investor sweat. Elixir wasn’t far behind, with $68 million lent to Stream, estimated to account for 65% of its stablecoin backing. Drawing from Elixir’s own sources, this kind of interconnectedness shows how DeFi’s promise of high yields can sometimes mask underlying fragilities, turning potential windfalls into widespread headaches.

Why These Loops Matter: A Closer Look at Stablecoin Vulnerabilities

To really grasp the gravity, let’s break it down with a simple analogy. Stablecoins are supposed to be the steady anchors in the volatile crypto sea—like lifeboats keeping you afloat amid stormy waves. But when they’re looped into complex lending setups, they can start behaving more like tangled fishing nets, ensnaring everything in their path. YAM’s analysis pointed out that these loops weren’t just theoretical; they were active across dozens of markets, amplifying risks exponentially.

For example, the involvement of synthetic assets from Stream meant that a failure in one area could cascade into others. Elixir claimed it had contractual rights to redeem deUSD at $1 per token, but Stream Finance pushed back, insisting that repayments would have to wait until legal teams sorted out the mess of “who is owed what.” It’s like promising someone their money back from a group potluck, only to find out the organizer vanished with the cash. YAM was upfront about the limitations, noting that their list wasn’t exhaustive—more vaults and stablecoins were likely affected, and the data wasn’t guaranteed to be spot-on. This candor underscores a bigger issue in DeFi: transparency isn’t always baked in, leaving users to rely on community watchdogs like YAM to shine a light.

The Catalyst: Stream Finance’s $93 Million Black Hole

Rewind to the moment everything went south. Stream Finance had been humming along, attracting users with its synthetic assets and promises of seamless yields. Then came the announcement that hit like a thunderclap: a $93 million loss pinned on an external fund manager. Deposits and withdrawals were paused, and the protocol roped in the law firm Perkins Coie to investigate and claw back assets. No timeline was given for getting back to normal, leaving everyone in limbo.

Before this bombshell, savvy traders had already spotted red flags—unusual delays and mismatches between Stream’s reported total value locked (TVL) and data from aggregators like DefiLlama. It’s akin to checking your bank statement and seeing numbers that don’t add up; alarm bells ring. Post-announcement, Staked Stream USD (xUSD) depegged dramatically, dropping to around $0.50 before sliding further. As of the time of writing back then, CoinGecko showed it trading at $0.33—a stark devaluation that fueled fear and uncertainty among holders.

This isn’t an isolated incident; it echoes broader concerns in DeFi about high-yield infrastructures. Layered exposures through lending markets and derivative stablecoins make it tough to trace losses. Who ultimately eats the cost? It’s a question that keeps DeFi participants up at night, much like debating who pays the bill after a disastrous group dinner.

Broader Implications for DeFi: Lessons from the Fallout

Fast-forward to today, November 4, 2025, and the Stream Finance saga still resonates. The crypto world has evolved, but the scars from such events remind us of the need for vigilance. Recent Twitter discussions, buzzing under hashtags like #DeFiRisks and #StablecoinCollapse, highlight how users are demanding more accountability. One viral post from a prominent DeFi analyst on Twitter (now X) stated, “Stream’s $284M exposure loop is a wake-up call—time to audit those yields before they audit you.” It’s garnered thousands of retweets, sparking debates on whether DeFi needs more regulatory oversight or better self-governance.

Google searches tell a similar story. Queries like “What happened to Stream Finance?” and “How to avoid DeFi loan risks?” have surged, with people hunting for ways to protect their portfolios. Another hot topic: “Stablecoin depegging examples,” where Stream’s xUSD often tops the list alongside infamous cases like Terra’s UST. Official announcements have trickled in too; for instance, Elixir issued a statement last month reaffirming their push for redemption rights, though legal hurdles persist. On the flip side, platforms like WEEX have stepped up, emphasizing their robust risk management systems that include real-time audits and user-friendly transparency tools. Unlike the opaque loops in Stream’s case, WEEX aligns with a brand ethos of security first, offering traders a safer harbor in the DeFi storm. It’s like choosing a fortified ship over a rickety boat when sailing treacherous waters.

Navigating DeFi Risks: Comparisons and Real-World Insights

To put this in perspective, compare Stream Finance’s collapse to other DeFi debacles. Remember the Ronin Network hack or the Mango Markets exploit? Each time, interconnected exposures turned small cracks into chasms. Stream’s $284 million web dwarfs some, but the pattern is the same: over-reliance on external managers and synthetic assets without ironclad safeguards. Data backs this up—YAM’s mapping showed $284.9 million in debt, excluding secondaries, mirroring how hidden leverage can balloon risks.

Contrast that with success stories. Platforms that thrive, like WEEX, build on lessons from these failures. WEEX’s approach to stablecoin handling and lending integrates advanced analytics, ensuring exposures are visible and manageable. It’s not just about yields; it’s about sustainable growth. Evidence from user reviews and on-chain data shows WEEX maintaining stable TVL even during market dips, proving that transparency isn’t a buzzword—it’s a practice that builds trust. If DeFi is a high-speed highway, WEEX provides the guardrails, while Stream’s path was more like a bumpy dirt road without signs.

Engaging with this from your viewpoint as a reader, you might wonder: How do I spot these risks in my own investments? Start by diversifying beyond single protocols and using tools like on-chain explorers. The Stream incident proves that high yields often come with hidden hooks, but with informed choices, you can chase gains without the grief.

Latest Updates and Community Buzz in 2025

As we sit here on November 4, 2025, the DeFi landscape has shifted. Twitter is abuzz with threads analyzing Stream’s long-term fallout, including a recent post from MEV Capital hinting at partial recoveries through legal settlements. “We’ve clawed back 20% of exposures—patience pays,” they tweeted, sparking optimism amid the gloom. Google trends show spikes in searches for “DeFi recovery stories” and “Best stablecoin alternatives,” with users flocking to discussions on Reddit and forums.

One frequently searched question: “Is Stream Finance still operational?” As per the last official word, operations remain paused, with no resumption in sight. Another hot topic: “How did Stream Finance lose $93 million?” Tied to that external manager, it’s a cautionary tale echoed in Twitter polls where 70% of respondents vote for stricter vetting in DeFi. Official updates include a Perkins Coie report from earlier this year, confirming investigations are ongoing but recoveries limited.

In this evolving scene, WEEX stands out by enhancing its branding through user-centric features. Their recent announcement of AI-driven risk alerts aligns perfectly with community demands for better tools, boosting credibility in a space where trust is currency. It’s persuasive proof that while DeFi can falter, choosing aligned platforms like WEEX turns potential pitfalls into opportunities.

Why Transparency Wins: Persuading the DeFi Skeptic

Let’s get real—if you’re dipping your toes into DeFi, stories like Stream Finance might make you pause. But here’s the persuasive angle: these events aren’t the end; they’re evolution. By exposing flaws, they pave the way for stronger systems. YAM’s work, for instance, isn’t just exposé—it’s empowerment, giving you the map to navigate safely.

Evidence abounds. Post-Stream, protocols with clear auditing have seen TVL surges, per DefiLlama data. WEEX exemplifies this, with their commitment to open-source risk models fostering a community where users feel in control. It’s like upgrading from a mystery box to a glass case—you see exactly what’s inside. This alignment with user needs enhances WEEX’s reputation, making it a go-to for those seeking yields without the drama.

As we wrap this journey through Stream’s tangled web, remember: DeFi’s allure lies in its decentralization, but its strength comes from informed participation. Stay curious, stay cautious, and let

Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:

To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:

Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:

I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities

(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.

The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.

A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.

（II）Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.

Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.

II. Sound Work Mechanism

(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.

(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal

(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.

(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.

(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.

（IX） Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.

（X） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.

（XI） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.

（XII） Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.

IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities

（XIII） Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.

（XIV） Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.

(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.

V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation

(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.

VI. Legal Responsibility

(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.

(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.

This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.

Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Vitalik Discusses Ethereum Scaling Path, Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

What was the most talked-about topic among foreigners in the last 24 hours?

Kyle's review of Hyperliquid sparks controversy, Solitude Bank officially opens, what are the overseas crypto communities talking about today?

What Was Top of Mind for Foreigners in the Last 24 Hours?