What Happens to Ether and XRP If Bitcoin Crashes? Unpacking Crypto Market Shocks and Strategies
Key Takeaways
- A sudden Bitcoin drop can spark widespread panic across the crypto market, pulling Ether and XRP down through shared liquidity issues and shaken investor trust.
- High correlations between Bitcoin, Ether, and XRP mean these altcoins rarely escape unscathed during crises, often moving in tandem rather than based on their unique strengths.
- Tools like correlation coefficients and beta analysis help predict how much Ether and XRP might fall if Bitcoin plunges, offering a roadmap for risk assessment.
- Smart hedging strategies, such as using derivatives or shifting to yield-generating assets, can protect portfolios from Bitcoin’s dominance fading or a sharp price decline.
- Platforms like WEEX provide reliable tools for monitoring correlations and executing hedges, enhancing trader confidence in volatile times.
Imagine you’re sailing on a vast ocean where Bitcoin is the massive flagship leading a fleet of smaller vessels, including Ether and XRP. If that flagship hits a storm and starts sinking, do the others stay afloat, or do they get dragged into the whirlpool? That’s the gripping question at the heart of the crypto world. Bitcoin has long been the kingpin, dictating the rhythm of the entire market. But what if it stumbles hard—say, a 50% price plunge? Would Ether, with its smart contract prowess, or XRP, known for cross-border payments, hold their own? Or would they crash right alongside it? In this exploration, we’ll dive into the interconnected web of cryptocurrencies, using real data and analogies to make sense of potential chaos. We’ll look at why Bitcoin’s sway matters so much, how to measure the risks, what might unfold for Ether and XRP, and practical ways to shield your investments. Along the way, we’ll touch on hot topics buzzing on Google and Twitter, plus the latest updates as of 2025, to give you a full picture of this dynamic landscape.
Bitcoin’s role in the crypto ecosystem is like that of a cornerstone in a towering building—if it cracks, the whole structure wobbles. Its dominance, often hovering around a significant portion of the total market cap, sets the tone for investor sentiment and liquidity flows. Think about traditional stock markets: when a giant like Apple takes a hit, it doesn’t just affect tech stocks; ripples spread to suppliers, competitors, and even unrelated sectors through eroded confidence. Crypto operates on a similar principle, but amplified by its youth and volatility. Bitcoin acts as the anchor, providing a sense of direction and stability. When it weakens, everything else feels the pull.
Historically, this interdependence shows up in stark ways. Take the broad market liquidation event after the tariff announcement on Oct. 10, 2025. Bitcoin dropped sharply, and correlations tightened. The link between Bitcoin and Ether jumped from 0.69 to 0.73, while Bitcoin and XRP’s correlation rose from 0.75 to 0.77 in just eight days. This isn’t random; it’s a sign that in times of stress, the market lumps all cryptocurrencies together as one big risky bet, ignoring individual perks like Ether’s decentralized apps or XRP’s speedy transactions. Utility takes a backseat to survival instincts.
This pattern underscores a key truth: if Bitcoin’s price crashes or its market share dips dramatically, Ether and XRP won’t likely break free. They’ll feel the pain through two main pathways. First, there’s the liquidity channel, where a Bitcoin sell-off triggers margin calls and forced sales across exchanges, sucking capital out of the entire space. It’s like a bank run where everyone rushes for the exits at once, trampling altcoins in the process. Second, the sentiment channel erodes faith in crypto’s core promise of decentralization and innovation. If the original crypto heavyweight falters, doubts creep in about the viability of others, pushing investors toward safer harbors like traditional fiat or gold.
Why Bitcoin’s Dominance Shapes the Crypto Landscape
To truly grasp this, let’s zoom in on Bitcoin’s dominance. It’s not just a number—it’s a measure of influence. When dominance is high, Bitcoin steers the ship, and altcoins ride the waves it creates. But if it slips, say from 60% to 40%, the market reshuffles in unpredictable ways. Picture a pack of wolves where the alpha suddenly weakens; the others jostle for position, but chaos ensues before a new order forms. In crypto, this often means heightened volatility for assets like Ether and XRP.
Data backs this up. During past downturns, correlations spike because investors treat crypto as a monolithic asset class. Remember the COVID-19 market stress? Bitcoin’s link to broader equities tightened, and altcoins followed suit. It’s a reminder that external shocks, like macroeconomic fears, amplify these ties. For Ether, which powers a vast ecosystem of apps and staking, this can be frustrating—its real-world use cases should offer some buffer, right? Yet, in a panic, fundamentals get overshadowed by collective fear.
XRP faces its own hurdles here. Often positioned for institutional payments, it lacks the deep on-chain activity of Ether, making it more vulnerable to sentiment swings. If Bitcoin crashes, XRP might drop harder due to its regulatory baggage and less organic demand. But here’s where platforms like WEEX shine—they offer tools to track these dynamics in real time, helping traders align their strategies with market realities. By providing secure, user-friendly interfaces for monitoring dominance metrics, WEEX empowers users to stay ahead, turning potential pitfalls into opportunities.
Measuring the Risks: Tools to Forecast Ether and XRP’s Fate in a Bitcoin Slump
So, how do you prepare for such a scenario? It starts with smart measurement. Let’s break it down step by step, using everyday analogies to keep things clear.
First, define your shock event. Maybe it’s a 50% Bitcoin drop over 30 days, or a dominance slide that shakes the foundations. This sets the stage, like plotting a storm’s path on a weather map.
Next, quantify how tied Ether and XRP are to Bitcoin. The Pearson correlation coefficient is your go-to tool here—it’s like checking how closely two dancers move in sync. A score near +1 means they’re mirroring each other perfectly. Based on recent data, these correlations are often high, signaling strong dependence.
Then, dive into beta analysis. This is akin to figuring out how much a trailer sways when the truck it’s hitched to swerves. If Ether’s beta to Bitcoin is 1.1, a 50% Bitcoin fall could imply a 55% drop for Ether. It’s a simple multiplication that gives a ballpark estimate.
But don’t stop there—adjust for real-world messiness. Liquidity risks, like thin order books on exchanges, can exaggerate drops. High open interest in derivatives might fuel cascading liquidations, turning a bad day into a catastrophe. For instance, if that initial 55% estimate gets compounded by 10% due to poor liquidity, you’re looking at a 65% plunge. Platforms like WEEX excel in this area, offering deep liquidity and advanced analytics to spot these risks early, ensuring traders can hedge effectively without getting caught off guard.
Real-World Scenarios: Ether and XRP Under Bitcoin Pressure
Now, picture the fallout. In finance, a big index like the S&P 500 crashing leads to contagion—money flees to safety, and everything tanks indiscriminately. Crypto mirrors this but faster, with Bitcoin as the spark. Look at past events like the FTX or Terra implosions: Bitcoin led the dive, and altcoins plummeted in unison.
For Ether, there’s some hope. Its staking mechanisms and app ecosystem create a utility floor, potentially aiding a quicker bounce-back. It’s like a sturdy house in a hurricane—damaged but not demolished. During stress, its correlation with Bitcoin rises, but once calm returns, Ether’s strengths shine through.
XRP, however, might suffer more. Without Ether’s yield options or broad adoption, it’s like a speedboat in rough seas—fast but fragile. Regulatory risks add weight, making it prone to deeper dives. In a Bitcoin shock, both could see liquidity flood into stablecoins, prolonging the pain.
Interestingly, did you know that while Bitcoin often dances independently from stocks, extreme events like the pandemic pull it into sync? This highlights crypto’s maturing ties to global finance.
Hot Topics on Google and Twitter: What’s Buzzing in 2025
As of November 4, 2025, Google searches are lighting up with queries like “What if Bitcoin crashes 2025?” and “Ether vs Bitcoin correlation,” reflecting widespread anxiety about market interdependence. People are also hunting for “XRP price prediction if BTC falls,” showing a thirst for predictive insights amid volatility.
On Twitter, discussions are heated. Threads about “Bitcoin dominance drop effects on altcoins” have gone viral, with users debating decoupling myths. A recent post from a prominent analyst on October 30, 2025, warned: “If BTC dips below $50K, expect ETH to follow by 60%—data doesn’t lie.” Official announcements add fuel; Ethereum’s latest upgrade tweet on November 1, 2025, touted improved scalability, sparking debates on whether it could buffer against Bitcoin woes. Meanwhile, Ripple’s update on XRP’s payment integrations has Twitter abuzz, with some claiming it might insulate XRP from full contagion. These conversations underscore a community grappling with uncertainty, often turning to platforms like WEEX for reliable data feeds and trading options that align with these real-time insights.
Hedging Strategies: Protecting Your Portfolio from Bitcoin Shocks
Hedging isn’t about avoiding risks—it’s about navigating them wisely. Diversification alone won’t cut it when correlations skyrocket; you need targeted moves.
Consider derivatives: In panic, futures might trade at discounts, opening arbitrage doors. It’s like buying low during a sale, profiting from inefficiencies without betting on direction.
Buffer your portfolio with stable assets—tokenized gold or RWAs act as life preservers. WEEX stands out here, offering seamless access to these alongside crypto pairs, bolstering your defenses with top-tier security and low fees.
Keep an eye on correlation ratios for early warnings. And rebalance toward yields: Staking or lending generates returns even in downturns, softening blows.
Every move carries risks, so research thoroughly. But with thoughtful strategies, a Bitcoin crash doesn’t have to sink your ship.
In wrapping up, the crypto seas are turbulent, but understanding these connections equips you to sail smarter. Whether Bitcoin holds firm or falters, Ether and XRP’s paths are intertwined—yet with the right tools and mindset, you can chart a resilient course.
FAQ
What causes high correlations between Bitcoin, Ether, and XRP during market crashes?
High correlations spike because investors view crypto as one asset class in crises, ignoring individual utilities and focusing on overall risk, leading to synchronized price drops.
How can I calculate the potential impact of a Bitcoin drop on my Ether holdings?
Use beta analysis: If Ether’s beta to Bitcoin is 1.1 and Bitcoin falls 50%, expect around a 55% drop for Ether, adjusted for liquidity factors.
Is XRP more vulnerable than Ether if Bitcoin’s dominance falls?
Yes, XRP often faces steeper declines due to regulatory risks and less on-chain yield, while Ether’s ecosystem provides some recovery support.
What are effective ways to hedge against a Bitcoin price plunge?
Explore derivatives for arbitrage, hold stable assets like tokenized gold, monitor correlations, and shift to yield-bearing positions like staking.
How do platforms like WEEX help in managing crypto market risks?
WEEX offers real-time analytics, deep liquidity, and secure trading tools to track dependencies and execute hedges, enhancing stability in volatile conditions.
You may also like
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon 2026: How Top AI Strategies Dominated Real Markets
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon demonstrates that effective trading — whether powered by AI or human judgment — relies on core principles: understanding market structure, maintaining conviction, prioritizing quality over quantity, and managing risk intelligently.
WEEX Ai Trading Hackathon vs. Other AI Trading Competitions: Which Is Better for You?
The AI trading competition landscape offers distinct paths for growth. The WEEX AI Trading Hackathon differentiates itself through its focus on real-market execution and practical viability, positioning it as a key platform for aspiring quantitative traders and strategists.
Is AI Trading Replacing Humans? WEEX Hackathon Reveals the Future of Fintech
The WEEX AI Trading Hackathon reveals that the future of trading is not about AI replacing humans, but about collaboration. AI enhances trading capabilities, while human judgment, ethics, and strategic oversight remain essential.

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 9th - A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report

"2.5 Dip" Real Reason: Wall Street Deleveraging Induced Overreaction

Kyle's review of Hyperliquid sparks controversy, Solitude Bank officially opens, what are the overseas crypto communities talking about today?

Cryptocurrency prices in the dumps, but the prediction market is going wild?
Decoding Strategy’s Latest Financial Report: After a $12.4 Billion Loss, How Long Can the Bitcoin Flywheel Keep Spinning?
When earnings reports become electrocardiograms of Bitcoin’s price, Strategy is not merely a company—it’s an experiment testing whether faith can overcome gravity.

Discover How to Participate in Staking
Staking is a digital asset yield product launched by the WEEX platform. By subscribing to Staking products, users can stake their idle digital assets and earn corresponding Staking rewards.

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines
This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk
Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:
To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:
Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:
(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.
The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.
A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.
(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.
Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.
(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.
(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.
(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.
(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.
(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.
(IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.
(X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.
(XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.
(XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.
(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.
(XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.
(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.
(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.
(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.
(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.
This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.

Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started
Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook
Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

Vitalik Discusses Ethereum Scaling Path, Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon 2026: How Top AI Strategies Dominated Real Markets
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon demonstrates that effective trading — whether powered by AI or human judgment — relies on core principles: understanding market structure, maintaining conviction, prioritizing quality over quantity, and managing risk intelligently.
WEEX Ai Trading Hackathon vs. Other AI Trading Competitions: Which Is Better for You?
The AI trading competition landscape offers distinct paths for growth. The WEEX AI Trading Hackathon differentiates itself through its focus on real-market execution and practical viability, positioning it as a key platform for aspiring quantitative traders and strategists.
Is AI Trading Replacing Humans? WEEX Hackathon Reveals the Future of Fintech
The WEEX AI Trading Hackathon reveals that the future of trading is not about AI replacing humans, but about collaboration. AI enhances trading capabilities, while human judgment, ethics, and strategic oversight remain essential.