Why Recession Risk Stays Low Despite Costs
By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/14 21:45:05
0
Share
President Donald Trump holds a chart about reciprocal tariffs. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP) ... More (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images) Tariffs by themselves will not send the U.S. economy into recession, though they will hurt the economy by a small amount. Almost all economists, including me, believe they are poor economic policy, but the magnitude of harm won’t be great enough to send us into a nosedive. Uncertainty about tariffs could trigger a recession, as described in my economic forecast update. Assuming that all of the major trade deals are settled this summer, even high tariff rates will not send the economy into recession. This is a narrow view—tariffs and the short-run economic outlook—that ignores long-term consequences as well as impacts on specifically-impacted businesses, workers and consumers. Consumer Spending After Tariffs Imposed After tariffs are implemented, consumers in the U.S. will have lower purchasing power. Usually this means tapering off spending over time, on an inflation-adjusted basis. They may actually spend more dollars, but they will receive less value for their transactions. An increase in the foreign exchange rate for dollars will mitigate the tariff impact. As our trade deficit falls, foreigners receive fewer dollars that they need to exchange for their own currencies. Supply and demand boosts the greenback, and then our foreign purchases become somewhat cheaper. However, net prices facing consumers will be higher. Domestic production of consumer goods and services will decline (on an inflation-adjusted basis) a small amount, but the process is complicated. Consumers will try to substitute domestic for foreign products to avoid high prices, but this ability is limited. In some cases, domestic producers do not currently have capacity to fill the domestic demand. But with consumers looking for better value than they find in imported goods, American businesses will be able to boost prices. Although they will face political pressure against price gouging, they will end discounts and sales, offer less favorable payment terms, and cite increased costs as they pay more to attract workers and compete with other companies for raw materials. (I have described in more detail how this will play out in the automobile industry.) The most import-intensive sectors illustrate this challenge. According to a Commerce Department study, the manufactured goods categories with the heaviest import percentages are apparel (88% imported), computers and electronics (69%) and electric equipment and appliances (59%). U.S. companies in these industries will enjoy boosted demand—to the extent that they have capacity—but they can hardly produce enough any time soon to replace most imported products. Businesses will need equipment capacity, an expanded supply chain of raw and intermediate materials, and they will have to find qualified workers in a fairly tight labor market. Most of these imports, though, are discretionary for consumers. People can usually delay or do without new clothes, new phones and new appliances. To the extent that consumers eschew imports with tariffs, they will have money to spend on other things. But those who feel compelled to spend despite the higher prices of imports will have less money available for domestically-produced goods. This effect will dominate, reducing GDP a bit. The least import-dominated sectors are printing (10% imported), paper (11%) and food and beverages (12%). These domestic producers will probably be able to bump their production up a fair amount relative to past import levels, though labor is generally tight across the entire economy. In between are the battle-ground industries, such as automobiles, where tariffs will tend to boost domestic demand, up to the industry’s capacity. All told, consumers will have less purchasing power. They may spend more dollars, but they will receive fewer goods on an inflation-adjusted basis. Substituting domestic goods for imports may provide some short-term stimulus to the economy, offset by the reduced real spending. The spending reduction, though, will likely be gradual. People seldom change their habits suddenly. They tend to adjust to the new reality over time. Consumer expectations for future tariff changes will also impact current spending. Those people who expect tariffs to come down after President Trump’s term of office ends will try to delay discretionary purchases. Others may perceive higher tariffs to be the new reality, hold their nose and buy the expensive goods. Most likely, many will try to delay big-ticket expenditures on high-tariff products. Tariffs Will Slow Construction Tariffs will raise the cost of construction, though less than proportionately to the entire cost of a project. The total cost of erecting and finished a building includes land and labor, neither of which can be subject to tariffs. It’s the materials prices that will feel stiff jolts from tariffs. For large projects, steel and cement will become more expensive. And most electrical components and plumbing products will be more expensive. Residential construction won’t go up in cost as much, due to use of domestic lumber rather than imported steel. Higher costs won’t clobber construction, but projects that are on the margin, where the developer isn’t sure whether to proceed, will be cancelled, delayed or downsized. Business Capital Spending Companies in competition with imports will want to increase production capacity, but they will face a timing quandary. Many corporate equipment purchases entail long lead times. Companies will have to predict whether their tariff-induced demand will continue long enough to justify big-ticket expenditures with long lead times. Some will take the risk, others not. Companies with little import competition will likely reduce their capital expenditures. They will see higher price tags on imported equipment and also higher prices on domestic equipment. Domestic equipment sales and production will almost certainly drop. This sector totals just five percent of U.S. production, so even a large hit won’t be enough to pull the economy into recession. U.S. Exports U.S. exporters will face reduced quantity of goods demanded, as retaliatory tariffs discourage foreign buyers. In some cases, the foreign buyers will have few good options. Where they do, however, they will avoid American products. Exports of goods make up seven percent of our gross domestic product, which means that a decline won’t be awful. Recession Risk From Tariffs The tariff hikes present risk to business as total inflation-adjusted spending drops. For likely tariff rates, up to maybe 30%, economic growth will slow but drop into recession. Specific businesses will be hurt harder, and long-term impacts will compound like interest—but negatively. However, companies will continue to find opportunities for growth and profitability. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2025/05/14/tariff-economics-why-recession-risk-stays-low-despite-costs/
You may also like

Ten Thousand Words Interpretation of STRC: Strategy for Making Money to Buy Coins New Magic
The real momentum of the BTC rebound - for every 1 dollar of STRC issued, there corresponds 3 dollars of BTC buying.

What competitive advantages are still defensible in the AI era?
Based on the signals received, determine the direction, and act immediately

For Whom the Bell Tolls, For Whom the Lobster Feeds? A Dark Forest Survival Guide for the 2026 Agent Player
If an AI has read Machiavelli and is much smarter than us, they would be very good at manipulating us — and you wouldn't even realize what's happening.

Circle CEO's Latest Interview: Stablecoins Are Not Cryptocurrency
The true meaning of a stablecoin is to turn the US dollar into an internet-native currency and eventually create an internet financial platform

Deconstructing the Public Chain Pharos Capital Game: Is a $950 million valuation supported by assets like photovoltaics just a shell transaction under layers of betting?
When a physical industry company injects physical assets into a Layer 1 project, it can easily create a valuation of 950 million dollars by calculating several times the value of the physical assets. Is this kind of capital game too outrageous? Does the crypto market really need such RWAs?

a16z: AI is making everyone 10x more productive, but the true winner has yet to emerge
Institutional AI and Retail AI "Better Integration" is an Inevitable Trend.

Why did the star Web3 project Across Protocol choose to abandon DAO?
The proposal for Across to privatize itself is a rare move, but it comes at a time when the industry is beginning to recognize that DAOs are a difficult organizational structure to operate.

In fact, ETH scaling is a major benefit for L2
ETH has finally admitted defeat—its Rollup-centric roadmap is unworkable, while the monolithic scaling solutions adopted by blockchains like Solana have proven to be correct.

Memories: 10 Key Contributions of the TON Core Team That Few People Knew in the Early Days
Every line of code, every tool we build, every sleepless night spent maintaining the network—these efforts have laid the foundation for TON's development today.

2025 South Korea CEX Listing Post-Mortem: Investing in New Coins = 70% Loss?
The 2025 South Korean exchange's new token listing performance is structurally similar to Binance's, with no significant differences.

BIP-360 Analysis: Bitcoin's First Step Towards Quantum Immunity, But Why Only the "First Step"?
This article explains how BIP-360 reshapes Bitcoin's quantum defense strategy, analyzes its enhancements, and discusses why it has not yet achieved full post-quantum security.

50 million USDT exchanged for 35,000 USD AAVE: How did the disaster happen? Who should we blame?
Due to a fatal flaw in the transaction path, a $50 million DeFi operation was executed with almost zero protection, resulting in nearly the entire amount of funds evaporating in a tiny liquidity pool.

The Cryptographic Past of the Middle East
Reality is often more exciting than fiction.

Resolving the Intergenerational Prisoner's Dilemma: The Inevitable Path of Nomadic Capital Bitcoin
When the baby boomer generation collectively sells off, who will become the "greater fool" in the next round of asset crashes?

Who Will Control AI? Why Decentralized AI May Be the Only Alternative to Government and Big Tech
AI has become critical infrastructure, and governments and corporations are competing to control it. Centralized development and regulation are entrenching existing power structures. The Web3 community is building a decentralized alternative — distributed compute, token incentives, and community governance — before that window closes.

Vitalik wrote a proposal teaching you how to secretly use AI large models
Vitalik believes that in the AI era, users should not have to give up their identity to use an AI tool.

On the eve of the explosion of on-chain options
Options are becoming a new anchor in the cryptocurrency market.

WEEX AI Hackathon: How Did This AI Trading Winner Succeed?
A self-taught AI trading enthusiast achieved top-10 results at the WEEX AI Hackathon. Learn about the mindset, AI tools, and lessons behind this impressive performance.
Ten Thousand Words Interpretation of STRC: Strategy for Making Money to Buy Coins New Magic
The real momentum of the BTC rebound - for every 1 dollar of STRC issued, there corresponds 3 dollars of BTC buying.
What competitive advantages are still defensible in the AI era?
Based on the signals received, determine the direction, and act immediately
For Whom the Bell Tolls, For Whom the Lobster Feeds? A Dark Forest Survival Guide for the 2026 Agent Player
If an AI has read Machiavelli and is much smarter than us, they would be very good at manipulating us — and you wouldn't even realize what's happening.
Circle CEO's Latest Interview: Stablecoins Are Not Cryptocurrency
The true meaning of a stablecoin is to turn the US dollar into an internet-native currency and eventually create an internet financial platform
Deconstructing the Public Chain Pharos Capital Game: Is a $950 million valuation supported by assets like photovoltaics just a shell transaction under layers of betting?
When a physical industry company injects physical assets into a Layer 1 project, it can easily create a valuation of 950 million dollars by calculating several times the value of the physical assets. Is this kind of capital game too outrageous? Does the crypto market really need such RWAs?
a16z: AI is making everyone 10x more productive, but the true winner has yet to emerge
Institutional AI and Retail AI "Better Integration" is an Inevitable Trend.