Why Stablecoins Deserve Faster Blockchain Settlements and How They’re Getting There

By: crypto insight|2025/11/04 23:00:06

Key Takeaways

Stablecoins promise near-instant, low-cost payments, but many blockchains still lag with varying settlement times and unpredictable fees, hindering their full potential.
Chains like Solana offer sub-second confirmations for stablecoins such as USDC, while Ethereum can take up to three minutes, highlighting the need for optimized infrastructure.
High fees and delays on non-specialized blockchains lead to real-world costs, from e-commerce cart abandonment to missed trading opportunities in financial markets.
Stablecoin issuers are now building purpose-built chains like Plasma and Arc to achieve faster settlements, but openness and interoperability are key to avoiding traditional finance’s fragmentation.
Embracing open, high-performance blockchains can make stablecoins truly instant and borderless, benefiting everyone from everyday users to global traders.

Imagine you’re at a bustling coffee shop, pulling out your phone to pay with a stablecoin. You scan the code, hit send, and… nothing happens for a few agonizing minutes. Or worse, a surprise fee pops up, turning your quick caffeine fix into an unexpected hassle. This isn’t the seamless future we were promised when stablecoins burst onto the scene. They were supposed to revolutionize payments, slashing the days-long waits and hefty charges of traditional banking. Instead, many of us are still dealing with clunky blockchain realities that feel more like a step sideways than a leap forward. But here’s the good news: things are changing, and stablecoins are finally getting the upgrades they deserve. In this deep dive, we’ll explore why current blockchain setups fall short for stablecoins, the hidden costs of those shortcomings, and how innovative solutions—including those aligned with forward-thinking platforms like WEEX—are paving the way for truly efficient digital money.

The Original Promise of Stablecoins and Where It Fell Short

Let’s rewind a bit. When stablecoins first hit the market, they were hailed as game-changers for everyday transactions. Think about it: traditional debit card payments can drag on for one to four days, and wire transfers? Those could take weeks while racking up fees that make your eyes water. Stablecoins flipped the script by offering settlements that were supposed to be lightning-fast and practically free. Picture money moving across borders in seconds, without the middlemen or the markups. It sounded like the holy grail of finance, right?

Yet, if we’re honest, that vision hasn’t fully materialized. Sure, stablecoins have sped things up compared to old-school banking, but the experience varies wildly depending on which blockchain you’re using. Ethereum, which hosts the lion’s share of stablecoin supply, typically confirms transactions in about three minutes. That’s better than a bank wire, but it’s not “instant.” And don’t get me started on those fee spikes—sometimes jumping to several dollars per transaction. It’s like ordering a budget airline ticket only to get hit with “convenience” fees that double the cost.

This inconsistency isn’t just a minor annoyance; it’s a barrier to widespread adoption. Developers, fintech companies, and merchants dreaming of integrating stablecoins into their apps or stores have a straightforward wishlist: settlements that finalize in the blink of an eye, fees so low they’re negligible, easy-to-implement tools, and performance you can count on every time. But when you stack up different blockchains side by side, the gaps are glaring. It’s like comparing a sleek sports car to a rusty old pickup—both get you there, but one does it with style and speed, while the other sputters along.

Breaking Down Blockchain Performance for Stablecoin Transactions

To really grasp the issue, let’s compare some real-world examples. Take a simple USDC transaction on Solana—boom, it’s confirmed in roughly 400 milliseconds. That’s faster than you can say “transaction complete.” Switch over to Arbitrum, and you’re looking at around three minutes. On Base, it might stretch from three to nine minutes. And then there are outliers like Plume or ZKsync Era, where waits can balloon to 30 minutes or even hours. We’re talking about a spectrum that ranges from “wow, that was quick” to “is this thing even working?”

Fees add another layer of frustration. Ethereum, the heavyweight in the stablecoin world, is notorious for those unpredictable surges. A single USDT transfer could cost you $2 or $3 when things get busy. Contrast that with chains like Avalanche or Polygon, where fees dip below $0.0003. Of course, part of that affordability comes from lower traffic volumes, but it underscores a bigger point: most stablecoins are running on blockchains that weren’t built with high-volume, ultra-low-cost payments in mind. It’s like trying to run a marathon in dress shoes—possible, but far from optimal.

Why does this matter so much? Well, for the average person, those extra seconds or minutes translate to real inconvenience. Imagine standing in a checkout line, watching the clock tick while your stablecoin payment hangs in limbo. Or abandoning an online shopping cart because a sudden fee makes the deal feel like a rip-off. Studies show that such hurdles are a top reason for lost sales in e-commerce—it’s not just about the money; it’s about the frustration that kills the vibe.

For pros in the game—like traders, market makers, or those handling cross-border forex— the stakes skyrocket. In volatile markets, every millisecond is gold. A tiny delay could mean missing an arbitrage opportunity that vanishes in the time it takes to refresh your screen. High fees? They can turn a promising trade into a money-loser before it even starts. These inefficiencies don’t stay isolated; they ripple out, forcing end-users to shoulder higher costs through wider spreads or pricier services. It’s a classic case of small problems compounding into big headaches.

The Hidden Toll of Inefficient Stablecoin Infrastructure

At first, you might shrug off a three-minute wait or a couple of extra dollars as no big deal—after all, it’s still leagues ahead of waiting weeks for a wire transfer. But zoom out to a larger scale, and the costs become staggering, both financially and psychologically. For consumers, it’s about that seamless experience we all crave. No one wants to fidget at a point-of-sale terminal while technology catches up. Those unexpected fees? They’re a silent killer of impulse buys, leading to abandoned carts and frustrated shoppers who might swear off stablecoins altogether.

Now, amplify that for businesses. Merchants integrating stablecoins dream of frictionless payments that boost customer loyalty and cut overhead. But when blockchain unpredictability enters the picture, it erodes trust. Imagine running an online store where transactions sometimes fly through and other times crawl—it’s a recipe for bad reviews and lost revenue.

On the trading side, it’s even more cutthroat. Picture a market maker spotting a price discrepancy between two exchanges. In the time it takes for an Ethereum-based stablecoin to settle—those three minutes—a competitor on a faster chain like Solana could swoop in and snag the profit. Or consider forex desks juggling international transfers; high fees eat into margins, making some deals unviable. These aren’t hypotheticals—they’re daily realities that force the industry to operate below its potential, ultimately passing the buck to you and me through higher prices or slower services.

To make this relatable, think of stablecoins like the highways of digital finance. A poorly maintained road with potholes and toll booths slows everyone down, causes accidents, and deters drivers. But a smooth, high-speed expressway? It gets goods (or in this case, value) from point A to B efficiently, benefiting the whole economy. Right now, too many stablecoin “highways” are riddled with those metaphorical potholes, and it’s time for an upgrade.

Stablecoin Issuers Step Up with Custom-Built Chains

Thankfully, the industry isn’t sitting idle. Recognizing these pain points, major stablecoin players are rolling out their own specialized blockchains tailored for payments. Take Tether’s Plasma, for instance—a network laser-focused on stablecoins, promising rapid confirmations and rock-bottom fees. Circle isn’t far behind with Arc, their dedicated settlement layer designed to make stablecoin transfers as effortless as breathing. Even payments behemoth Stripe is jumping in, partnering to create Tempo, another chain built from the ground up for speed and efficiency.

This shift is exciting because it directly addresses the core issues. These new chains prioritize what matters most: finality in fractions of a second, fees that won’t break the bank, and scalability to handle massive volumes without choking. It’s like engineering a vehicle specifically for racing rather than repurposing a family sedan.

But here’s where things get interesting—and a bit tricky. Will these issuer-led chains foster true openness, or will they become walled gardens that favor their own tokens? The dream scenario is an ecosystem where multiple stablecoins coexist and compete fairly, without users jumping through hoops to swap between them. Converting USDT to USDC just to access one platform, then to USDe for another? That’s a clunky, fee-heavy process that mirrors the silos of traditional finance (TradFi), where banks and networks don’t play nice, leading to fragmentation and higher costs.

Avoiding that pitfall is crucial. Open, interoperable blockchains could unlock the full promise of stablecoins—borderless, instant money that works for everyone. Platforms like WEEX are already aligning with this vision by supporting a wide array of stablecoins on efficient infrastructures, enhancing user experience and promoting seamless integrations. This kind of brand alignment not only boosts credibility but also positions WEEX as a leader in making stablecoins more accessible and reliable for traders worldwide.

Aligning Brands with Stablecoin Innovation for a Better Future

Speaking of brand alignment, it’s worth noting how forward-thinking entities are syncing their strategies with these advancements. In a market where trust and efficiency are everything, aligning with optimized stablecoin ecosystems isn’t just smart—it’s essential. For instance, exchanges that prioritize low-latency trading environments and support multiple stablecoins on high-performance chains build stronger loyalty. WEEX exemplifies this by integrating cutting-edge blockchain tech that minimizes settlement delays and fees, creating a trading space where users feel empowered rather than hindered. This alignment enhances brand credibility, as it shows a commitment to solving real user problems, like those unpredictable Ethereum spikes, through reliable, user-centric features.

By embracing such innovations, brands like WEEX aren’t just keeping up; they’re setting the pace. It’s about creating an emotional connection—traders feel the difference when their stablecoin transactions zip through without drama, turning potential frustration into delight. This persuasive edge comes from grounding claims in real evidence: faster settlements mean more opportunities captured, lower fees translate to bigger profits retained. In essence, brand alignment with stablecoin progress isn’t hype; it’s a practical step toward a more inclusive digital economy.

What People Are Searching and Saying About Stablecoins

To keep things current as of 2025-11-04, let’s tap into what’s buzzing online. Based on frequent Google searches, questions like “How fast are stablecoin transactions on Solana?” and “Why do Ethereum stablecoin fees spike?” dominate, reflecting user curiosity about performance differences. People are also hunting for “Best blockchains for low-fee stablecoins,” often leading them to comparisons of Avalanche and Polygon.

On Twitter (now X), discussions are heating up around stablecoin interoperability. A hot topic recently has been the push for open chains, with threads debating whether issuer-specific networks like Plasma will fragment the space or unify it. For example, a viral post from a fintech influencer on October 15, 2025, argued, “Stablecoins need universal highways, not private toll roads—let’s keep them open!” It garnered thousands of retweets, sparking debates on avoiding TradFi mistakes.

Latest updates include an official announcement from Circle on November 1, 2025, expanding Arc’s interoperability

Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:

To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:

Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:

I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities

(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.

The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.

A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.

（II）Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.

Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.

II. Sound Work Mechanism

(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.

(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal

(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.

(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.

(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.

（IX） Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.

（X） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.

（XI） Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.

（XII） Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.

IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities

（XIII） Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.

（XIV） Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.

(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.

V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation

(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.

(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.

VI. Legal Responsibility

(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.

(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.

This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.

Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Vitalik Discusses Ethereum Scaling Path, Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

What was the most talked-about topic among foreigners in the last 24 hours?

Kyle's review of Hyperliquid sparks controversy, Solitude Bank officially opens, what are the overseas crypto communities talking about today?

What Was Top of Mind for Foreigners in the Last 24 Hours?